Topics this issue include;
|
| 1. a 'Promise' Many apologies (once again) for last month's eNewsletter having been split into two parts, but I hope
that the 'sum of the total' didn't disappoint!
What I discovered from my own experience of both writing them and sending them out, was that due
to the size of the emails (and also because they contained 'images') they took a lot longer not only to
send, but also (for those still on dial-up connections) for them to be received.
Incidentally, should you not have received both parts, perhaps you could let me know which part (or
parts) were 'missing', and I'll send it/them to you by return. In view of the above however, I do promise
not to send any more two-part eNewsletters, and also to keep the messages as image-free as
possible. In the meantime, thank you for your patience and forbearing.
|
| 2. Good News! Although technically not 'Powditch' news, I thought that you might like to know that we became proud
grandparents for the second time on Sunday, 9 October 2005, when our daughter Kristian gave birth
to a beautiful and healthy baby girl. Details are as follows; weight 7lb 10oz ; length 21 inches ; hair
(some and brownish).
Of course, like any grandparent we are biased as to our granddaughter's beauty, but at least we were
in good company, as all the Doctors, midwives and others all said the same! At the moment she
doesn't have a name as her Mum and Dad haven't finalised one, although apparently they do like the
names of both Amy and Grace.
|
| 3. Welcome As you are aware, in last month's eNewsletter, this section was 'expanded'.
In the August eNewsletter I advised that whilst in past issues I had tended to only include basic
information of those requesting a copy of the eNewsletter, or contacting me about their connection
with the Powditch family, I would (from the August issue onwards), be including a little more
information about those being welcomed, as I believed that such extra information would not only be
of interest to all readers, but also that even just some of the details included, might trigger others'
family memories, and lead to more individual family reunions.
When however I received one confirmation of receipt of the eNewsletter in which was said "Thank
you for the warm welcome you gave me in the Welcome section of the eNewsletter. What a
surprise to see my contribution quoted in full. Fame at last! Hollywood next I guess!! ", I just
wondered whether my inclusion of full information might be a little intrusive of individuals' personal
messages to me.
In view of the latter - and because I have yet to have any other feedback from eNewsletter readers -
I am continuing to include a little more information (even though slightly edited) about those being
welcomed. However, I really would appreciate your comments as to whether I am 'overstepping the
mark' with what I have been sent and have repeated within the eNewsletter, or whether I am taking
the right path/approach. I do look forward to your views and comments re this.
I welcome to this edition of the eNewsletters, the following three Powditch descendants (all sisters,
and daughters of Joyce Turner, nee Powditch), who have contacted me since the last issue;-
a. Julia Dawson, from Australia, who emailed me to say that
"You were after the current address of Joyce Turner and Hazel Norquay in Australia. Sadly
Joyce Turner (my mother) passed away on 13 December 2002. Powditch Connection:
Grandfather was Thomas James Powditch 1886 - 1962, born Lismore NSW" and "I have
tentatively [been] researching my family history with the knowledge that Mum had done a lot
and it is in the papers held by my other sister Kathy Wood. Obviously I must see her about
them. Did Mum ever tell you about her children/grandchildren?
Pennington Powditch was born in 1889, probably in Lismore. I have no date for his death [but it
may be in Mum's papers]. He and Thomas James [my grandfather] both came to Sydney
together where Thomas James met my grandmother and the rest is history. "
b. Hazel Norquay, from Australia,
"I was sent to your site last week by my sister Julia Dawson, I put some details in but am not
sure whether it was at the right place. I remember Mum talking to me about you and the
research into Powditch, she sent me copies of some of the research but even though I have
been retired for six years I haven't done anymore. Powditch Connection: Mother Elgin Joyce
Powditch, Grandfather Thomas James Powditch, GGG Garret Jarvis Powditch"
c. Kathy Wood, from Australia,
"I am Kathy Wood, Joyce Turner's middle daughter. My younger sister, Julia Dawson, forwarded
a copy of your email to me. As Mum was in Sydney when she moved into Frank Whiddon
Village and then passed on, a lot of the material is with me.
I have not yet had time to go through all her papers but Mum was very thorough in keeping
things and I am sure that the papers will be amongst those I have in storage.
You have given me the push I need to get them out and go through them.
When Mum was here one day we looked up Powditch on the internet for her and showed her
the pictures of Wells-on ??. Needless to say she was most amazed to be able to find all that
information on the computer.
Mum often referred to Pennington but as I cannot recall at the moment in what context. It may
come to me and I will let you know. "
Not only are Julia, Kathy and Hazel greatly welcomed to the eNewsletters, but what I found especially
amazing, was that they all made contact with me after I'd included (under section 12. 'Lost' family
members) the following snippet -
"On the same topic, 2 other 'lost' Powditch descendants with whom I and others lost all contact
a very long time ago, are Joyce Turner (of the Sydney, NSW area) and her daughter,
Mrs Norquay (who used to live in the Brisbane, QLD, area). Both are descendants of Garrett
Jarvis Powditch who 'jumped ship' in Australia, and who later settled down and raised a family
there.
If anyone knows Joyce's - and her daughter's - current whereabouts, I'd be extremely happy to
receive the information, especially as I have further details re Garrett and his forbears."
- the amazing part being that neither Julia, Kathy nor Hazel had known that I'd made that request, and
yet within 4 days of my sending the eNewsletter, Julia had emailed me with the details!
Thank you so very much, and I will be in touch again soon.
|
| 4. Not me! Should you receive any emails from someone purporting to be admin(@)powditch.plus.com (I've only
put the @ into brackets so that the latter address won't be a accessible from this eNewsletter), please
will you note that they most certainly are not from me, and you should either report the sender to your
ISP, or click on 'Message' (from the top taskbar) and then click on 'Block Sender'.
The above situation has recently come to my attention because I have received several emails which
say that they are from the email address of admin(@)powditch.plus.com - and furthermore, the
Subject stated is "Account Alert".
As you are already aware, www.powditch.plus.com/ is a totally free website, and no charges are
made to any users or visitors for access to any or all of its pages. Consequently there is absolutely
no need whatsoever for either me or the website to have an 'Accounts' section.
Interestingly, whoever it is that's sending me these messages, s/he or they, 'sign' as "Powditch
Security Department" (sounds quite fascinating!).
For the record, whilst I do not have a "Powditch Security Department", my computer is protected by
the latest editions of both Norton's Systemworks and Internet Security (which are updated daily),
together with 'Spyware Doctor', and besides all outgoing emails being scanned by the programs
mentioned, they are also scanned by PlusNet, my excellent ISP. (I believe in protecting both my
computer as well as yours as much as possible, hence the 'belts and braces' attitude)
Just so as you can see the sort of message being sent by 'admin(@)powditch.plus.com ', I have
included the wording of their emails as follows;
Dear Valued Member,
According to our terms of services, you will have to confirm your e-mail by the following link or your account
will be suspended within 24 hours for security reasons
http:// 152.3.79.27:90 / Confirmation _ Sheet . pif http:// www. powditch @ powditch . plus . com . / confirm . php ?
email = powditch . plus . com (N.B. I have left spaces between words and punctuation marks so that the latter won't
become a link from this eNewsletter)
After following the instructions in the sheet, your account will not be interrupted and will continue as normal.
Thanks for your attention to this request. We apologize for any inconvenience
Sincerely,Powditch Security Department
As I said above, the messages are not from me, and most definitely should not be responded to.
The best action you can take is to put a block on admin(@)powditch.plus.com (I've only put the @ into
brackets so that the latter address won't be a accessible from this eNewsletter).
|
| 5. Are you receiving them OK? (eNewsletters, that is) Since the very first eNewsletter was written and sent - way back in May 2003 - the number of
Powditch and Powditch descendants having an email address, and therefore able to receive a copy
has increased from some 20 or so individuals back then, to 132 (plus an extra 3 which have been
added this month).
As at today, I still don't know whether all of the 132 eNewsletters sent last month, have been received
OK, for I have only received receipts verifying that the message has been read by the recipient, from
some 55 'recipients' - which leaves another 77 persons needing to tell me whether they've received
the eNewsletter(s).
Whilst it might be that I'm actually sending some eNewsletters to 'dead mailboxes', or to individuals
who might have originally provided me with a business email address which has subsequently
changed, it is normal for me to usually get notification of such accounts from the various ISPs, where
they advise me of such reasons as 'mailbox exceeded quota'; or 'addressee not recognised'; or
'account not receiving messages'; or 'mailbox no longer in use', etc, but at least in those instances I
have been able to take appropriate actions.
One 'action' I usually take, is to add the last known email address and the name of the individual, to
the www.powditch.plus.com/Missing/index.htm page in the hope that someone somewhere
(including the individual him/her self) will be able to provide me with the new or correct email address.
This has led to a few successes, details of which (but not the new email addresses themselves) are
then shown on the same page.
As you are aware, from time to time, I do request (via the 'Tools' > 'Options' > 'Receipts' menu) that a
'notification of receipt' is forwarded to me, just to ensure that sent emails are reaching you OK, and
whilst I do fully appreciate that - "message recipients can choose whether or not to send receipts.
If the message recipient agrees to send a read receipt, the receipt will be sent when the message
has been opened." - I would really appreciate a confirmation of receipt to be sent to me, even if you
have to do so in a 'standalone' email rather than a 'read receipt'. I appreciate that this might be a bit
of a pain from your point of view, but unless I know that you are actually receiving a copy (or copies) of
the eNewsletter, I might have to review my mailing list for those not sending me a 'read receipt' .
Whilst this possible review might appear to be rather drastic, I would like to say that as I send every
eNewsletter individually, to add all the individual email addresses, and then send the messages,
takes me in excess of two hours at present. Although I don't object to that length of time being spent, I
would just like to know that the eNewsletters are being received OK (at this stage I'm not so much not
interested in whether they are being read, just that you've received them!). Incidentally, the reason that
I send messages individually, is because viruses have a nasty habit of attaching themselves to
multiple addresses on just one outgoing email, not at the point of leaving the sender, but within the
'ether' before they reach the recipient (see topic 4. Not me!, paragraph 5, above, re my email
protection facilities)
In view of the above, I would be extremely grateful if - after you have read this message - you will
acknowledge receipt of this latest eNewsletter, and don't forget, if you aren't acknowledging receipt of
the eNewsletters because you would prefer not to receive the Powditch eNewsletter in the future, you
may simply reply to this email with your name and address (in the body of the message) and the
word "unsubscribe" (in the mail subject), and I'll cease from sending any further eNewsletters to you
(although I will still keep in touch re other Powditch etc matters).
Dependant upon the response to the above, I might, in next month's eNewsletter, include all those
persons who still haven't acknowledged receipt of same, on the basis that others' may know whether
the intended recipients have changed their email address(es) or have passed away, or w.h.y.
I do hope that you will forgive me for the above, but in view of the current situation - and dependant
upon the actual number of individuals who do actually want to have a copy of each months
eNewsletters, I could possibly be provided with more time to spend developing the website.
Thank you
|
| 6. Home page design change As advised in last month's eNewsletter, on 5 September, I added a new (different) home page to the
website, just to see whether it would be easier to use than the previous version, and in order to keep
my options open, both the old and new versions of that page were (and still are) available on-line.
In the same eNewsletter I also said that "I would be most grateful for you to have a look at both the
'Old'-style homepage at www.powditch.plus.com/index.htm as well as the 'New'-style homepage
at www.powditch.plus.com/index.html and for you to let me know which of the versions you prefer
and/or find easier to use".
To date I haven't had any feedback (good, bad or indifferent!) re the 'New-style' homepage, so I'm
hoping that the 'silence' means that the latter is acceptable. Am I right? Perhaps you could let me
know your comments sometime.
Thank you.
(P.S. the 'New-style' homepage is also directly available from www.powditch.plus.com/ )
|
| 7. Website updates Since the last eNewsletter (No.25, for August 2005), changes to the website, have included;-
Links page (www.powditch.plus.com/homepages/links.htm)
 Two new sections on that page now relate to;- (1) MISCELLANEOUS WEBSITES OF INTEREST which currently only has one link, although I thought it sounded brilliant when I first read about it. Just read the following, and see whether the site might be of interest to you as well. "Do you ever look at something from the past and wonder 'How much is that worth today?"'or when you are buying something, do you think, 'How much was that worth in the past?' Well now there's a chance for you to discover the answer to your wonderings etc, just by visiting the How much is that worth today? (http://www.eh.net/hmit/ppowerbp/ ) website. Be amazed by the wealth (or lack of it) of your ancestors, discover the price of property then (and value, now), see then and now how much valuables, groceries, or even a loaf of bread, cost, and decide whether you really are better off now than your ancestors' were in their day."(2) NEWSPAPERS & JOURNALS which are an excellent source material, not only for information re individuals (where mentioned) but also for what was happening when your forbears were alive; either in their immediate area or further afield. Three items added to the links page (www.powditch.plus.com/homepages/links.htm) under the 'Newspaper & Journals' topic, are two relating to the British Library's own collections, and one which is for on-line copies of the London Gazette, the Belfast Gazette and the Edinburgh Gazette. Although the latter covers (at the moment) only the 1900-c1999 period, I have found it to be of great assistance, and certainly most interesting, for topics included (and I have only been viewing the London Gazette for the moment) within the paper are as diverse as Military Awards, Citations, Wills, Bankruptcies, and Appointments. Regarding the two British Library links, whilst one looks at that Institutions holdings in general (i.e. Collections), the other link (i.e. NEWSPLAN) is a really exciting development in the digitising of historical newspapers etc, and making them available on-line. Obviously this is going to be a mammoth undertaking, but from what is available already, the future looks really interesting.Other updates and changes to the website within the past month, include;-
 www.powditch.plus.com/Exhibitions/index.htm which has been somewhat reduced in topics due to some Exhibitions having finished and other information not yet to hand. Any details you'd like me to add, please send me an email, and I'll be pleased to update that section. www.powditch.plus.com/Missing/index.htm has been updated to reflect those family members who have been 'Found', address-wise etc. www.powditch.plus.com/News/index.htm has been updated to include the link to last month's eNewsletter (now available on-line), whilst that eNewsletter is now also directly available from www.powditch.plus.com/News/enewsletter_august_2005.htm Besides both of those updates, www.powditch.plus.com/News/latest_news.htm (i.e. the Latest News section within the News file), has also been updated. www.powditch.plus.com/Webstats/index.htm has also been updated to now include the statistics for the month of September.The whole section re William Powditch (i.e. www.powditch.plus.com/WilliamPowditch/index.htm)
has been also been updated and amended, with new headers having been inserted for most of the
pages.
One new page added within the section is www.powditch.plus.com/WilliamPowditch/1821_1830.htm which, apart from providing an
overview of his 1821-1830 years, also provides links to individual year pages
|
| 8. Two Questions a. Does the Powditch website page fill your screen OK, or does it appear to be rather small?
Many (but not all) webmasters recommend these days that their websites are viewed on a screen size
of 1024 x 768 pixels, principally because they have not only designed their pages to hold as much
information as possible, but also for the pages to look their best at that size. In such cases, if your
Computer's Screen-size Setting is already set to that size and you are looking at a 'large' page, the
image of that page should fill your screen.
A 'problem' occurs however when your screen size is pre-set to 1024 x 768 pixels (as is usually the
case with recently-purchased computers - especially laptops) and you try to view a website which
has been designed at a lower pixel size (e.g. 800 x 600 - which used to be the 'standard' pixel rating -
and still is for the majority of websites). In those instances, what will appear on your screen(s) will be a
much smaller image of the webpage, which will probably occupy about 60% of the screen's width
(usually OK on height). What I would like to do for the moment (rather than me rush about, changing
each and every page to be viewable at 1024 x 768 pixels) is to ask you to let me know what is your
own Computer's Screen-size Setting.
If you don't know how to check, just follow the following instructions;-
Left click on your Start menu (bottom left hand corner), and from the menu, click on the 'Control
Panel' logo (one earlier operating systems such as Windows95/98/ME etc, you might have to
click on the 'Settings' logo before you can access 'Control Panel')
Left click on 'Control Panel', and from the screen which appears on your screen, left click on the
item headed 'Display' (its comment alongside usually says 'Changes display settings'), and
then left click on that item.
A new box will appear, headed 'Display Properties', and this box has several headers to it,
including 'Settings'.
Left click on the 'Settings' header, and you will be presented with information about your monitor,
the colour scheme it uses, and the Screen size being currently used. At this stage please do
not change any of the settings, but do please write down what the Screen size is set to, and
then left click on either the 'Cancel' button at the bottom of the page, or on the 'X' in the top right
corner of the box.
Once you know your Screen size setting, I would be most grateful if you could let me know what it is,
as I can then decide (based on the number of computers set to 1024 x 768 as opposed to those set
at 800 x 600)whether I need to redesign the website to accommodate the larger pixel sized screen,
or not.
Incidentally, if your screen is already set to 1024 x 768 pixels, do you find that the text size is not easy
to read? If so, you might have discovered that even resetting the text size to 'Largest' doesn't make
the text on the page that much easier to read. (Text size can be changed from the top menu of a
webpage, by left clicking on 'View', then from the drop down menu, left clicking on Text Size, and then
from the next drop down men, left clicking on 'Largest') If this is the case, there is an answer.
(b) Do you still use Dial-up to connect to the Internet, or have you now changed to Broadband?
For those who have already become a Broadband user, the speed of viewing webpages, especially
those with images, must provide the sensation of travelling on Concord! (something the rest of us
look forward to).
Personally, and mainly due to my creating and continually testing the Powditch website for dial-up
users, I'm still in the 'dark-ages' with having a Dial-up connection, but this might change depending
upon the quantity of those accessing the www.powditch.plus.com/ site.
As a 'dinosaur', and one who at present is only achieving a dial-up speed of 33,600kps (maximum)
I am pleased to say that with image-free websites (which is what the majority of the Powditch
website is), pages are viewable quite quickly (it's the images which, being slow to appear, mean
staying on a page for much longer). Having said that, because of my having a dial-up connection, I
am able to monitor (hopefully for the better) individual pages and images, and therefore 'tweak' the
latter to ensure that the pages/images appear quicker for you.
Having said all that, if the majority of Powditch website 'readers' are already Broadband-ers, it might
be best for me to join the 'club'.
I'd be very grateful therefore if you could you let me know which type of connection you have. Thanks.
|
| 9. Statistics Having highlighted various topics over the past couple of months I thought that you might be interested
to know what usage statistics I actually am presented with by the monitoring company every day,
week and month.
In last month's eNewsletter I mentioned the topics of 'hits' and 'visitors' and provided explanations for
both terms, but besides both of those, I am also presented with the number of Pages visited, the
number of Files accessed, as well as the number of Sites visited, both as a 'Daily Average', and a
(cumulative) 'Monthly Total'.
As 'number of sites visited' has been mentioned, I think that this month I'll just concentrate on that
topic, for you might not realise it, but the whole of the Powditch website is actually made up of (at
present) 344 individual 'site-addresses' or 'URL's, with many pages actually being provided within
each URL (Uniform Resource Locator).
To put it another way, the basic site-address/URL for the website, is
of those addresses (or URLs) will take you directly to the index or Home Site directly.
Although the same applies to entering www.powditch.plus.com/ the '/' advises the server on which
the website resides, that there are other site-addresses/URLs, so when I input say,
www.powditch.plus.com/PeerlessPowditch this will tell the server that I want to look at first of all
the Powditch website, and then at a File named PeerlessPowditch.
Of course, because the server needs me to say which Site-address/URL within the File I want to look
at, I need to provide some information after the PeerlessPowditch part of the address, and because I
don't know which section I need to check, first of all I add an '/' after the file name, so that it now looks
like this PeerlessPowditch/ and then I add the suffix, index.htm so that it becomes
PeerlessPowditch/index.htm
As you can probably see, what had previously looked like one website address, has now become 2,
being the basic address, (plus the file name), plus the Site 'name', two of which have been given an
individual URL.
When one then considers that within the number of individual files (i.e. 32 at present) there are
actually in excess of 344 individual Sites, each with its own URL (an average of 10 Sites per File,
although the majority have only one Site, and that's usually index.htm) you can see that the website is
quite large, and contains a lot of information.
Hopefully without confusing you too much further, each Site has anything from just one Page, upwards,
whilst some Sites can have as many as 45 webPages to them
(q.v. www.powditch.plus.com/PeerlessPowditch/chapter_11.htm for example), and even then,
each Page might only be printable in A4 Landscape format (which is the best to use for the latter
example), which means that printable pages may be way in excess of the length of each
webPage x A4 sheets of paper!
Powditch web statistic figures for the whole of the 16 January 2003 up to the end of September 2005
period, can be viewed at www.powditch.plus.com/Webstats/index.htm
|
| 10. Recap from last eNewsletter Powditch's in the 'Theatre of War' For a very long time, a section on the Powditch website had been devoted to those family members who fought in the two World Wars, as well as those who had been in other Wars
both before and after the former, and in view of the recent 'commemorations' relating to the
end of WWII (in 1945), I had been updating (where I knew such details) the relative webpages
for WWII (and also, a few for WWI).
As I admitted to not knowing about all of those Powditchs who were involved in WWII, nor all
about what they did, where they were posted, their 'position' (Rank-wise), nor of more besides,
I added the Powditch's in the 'Theatre of War' topic in the hope that readers of this
eNewsletter might be able to either fill in some of the 'blanks' or to provide information re family
members who have not (to date) been included (either for WWII or WWI or for any other 'war'),
and I included a copy of the then current page for those who fought in WWII, on the basis that if
you know about other Powditch family members who were involved in that (or any previous or
post) war, and you are able to not only provide details of their name(s) but also of their
involvement etc, you'll be able to 'set the record straight' for history - both Powditch and general.
To date I have gathered more information about some family members, but in the main, that
information has been obtained from the 'London Gazette' (now on-line), so if anyone else can
provide extra information, I'd be very grateful.
'Lost' family members In my last 2 eNewsletters I had written about Geoffrey Peter Powditch, who had been born in Wells-next-the-Sea, Norfolk, and who - about the year 1959 - emigrated to Australia, and was last heard of in 1965, when he was working in the area of Perth, Western Australia, and I asked whether anyone knew of his whereabouts. I still haven't heard anything about him, but I'm still hoping that 'no news is good news', although I think that I would prefer to hear something!!!As to the 2 other 'lost' Powditch descendants with whom I and others lost all contact a very long time
ago, (i.e. Joyce Turner, of the Sydney, NSW area, and her daughter, Mrs Norquay, who used to live in
the Brisbane, QLD, area), I hope that you will have already noted the sad yet exciting news under
topic 3. Welcome, above, where Joyce's three daughters have each contacted me.
Powditch Gathering 2006 Having highlighted in the last two eNewsletter about there going to be "another Powditch Family Gathering (PFG) in Morston, from 14 -17 September 2006), I have to apologise for still not having sent you such an email about the Gathering, although I can say that I am still waiting for replies to letters etc, and that I'll email you as soon as I have something more positive. I would like to give a special thanks to those who have already contacted me to advise (tentively for
the moment) that they would both like to, or will, be able to come to the event.
new section on websitewww.powditch.plus.com/Connections/kinship_chart.htm There's nothing like telling you that I've added a new section to the website, and then me forgetting to do so, but that's exactly what I did in this instance, so I can only apologise most profusely for my error! The Page is now available for you to look at, and hopefully it will allow you to work out your 'degree of kinship', and decide whether a particular relation of yours might be a cousin, second cousin thrice removed, or such like (hope it helps!) |
| 11. .....and finally! Thank you ever so much for being a reader of this eNewsletter, and moreso, for being either a
Powditch or a Powditch-descendant.
If I owe you an email reply, or if I haven't been in contact with you for a long while, I do hope to as soon
as possible in the near future. In the meantime, I do hope that you and your family are all keeping well,
and I look forward to hearing from you sometime, especially if you have any news (either for the
website or for the Powditch Archive).
John
|
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged.
If you are NOT the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are instead requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system.
JCA/Powditch website/Symantec endeavour to ensure that emails and any attachments generated from this email address are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, we cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all emails and attachments
"You are receiving this email as you are either a Powditch, a Powditch descendant, or have a connection to the greater family, and as such, you have been an user of the
www.powditch.plus.com/ website.
We value your privacy. You can change your contact preferences by emailing me at
 If you would prefer not to receive the Powditch eNewsletter in the future, you may simply reply to this email with the word "unsubscribe" in the mail subject.
The eNewsletter frequency will not be less than once a month. For offline assistance, please contact
me at John C Algar, 5a Southgate Road, Southgate, Gower, Swansea, United Kingdom, SA3 2BT
Telephone (within the UK = 01792 234554) or (International = +44 (0) 1792 234554)."
|
